|
Kavir
(generic you's coming)
As long as we're correcting each other, I have been defending the proposition that you shouldn't assume consent from an IP holder until you actually see it, and that it's appropriate for someone else to say "Hmm, are you sure you should be doing that?" if you do.
I don't want to interpret their wishes at all- the copyright notice on the book is pretty clear, and if they haven't said anything to the contrary I shouldn't ignore the stuff on ink and paper simply because the IP holder didn't respond to an email or hasn't broken out the lawsuits.
And that's what I caught in the edit to avoid the extended issue of what happens once the copyright holder's intent is clear. They're not opposites, btw- one is a possible evolution of the other.
Stilton
|