|
Your idea of what a script is is pretty limited I think. If you believe a script's rationality of behavior is a liability, you may want to look at why Kasparov lost.
This is a pointless argument with a foregone conclusion that nobody has been able to intelligently disagree with for at least a decade (though I know I tried, futile though it was). If you wish to conceive of scripts as these repetitive, easily-fooled things, that is your right, but I'm not going to argue about it.
--matt
|