Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Aeternitas · 12-13-2005, 08:26 PM

Just a few cents to toss in here, now that the crap has flown for a few hours again...as a sidenote, I am amazed by the petty behaviour from all sides.

First, the modification made to the rules, seems to be serving to JUST FIT what Aardwolf chooses to do. Is it because they did it first? I seriously doubt that it can be that they have a better game, and because if it, I'd like to call on Synozeer to ask him what game(s) HE plays, and perhaps what levels of characters he has on them...not to cry Conspiracy Theory, or anything. Back to the system, it is, regardless of opt-in/opt-out, a canvass of the game. Without any game having a system of this nature, would the votes still break down the way they do? THAT QUESTION has yet to be asked.

Second, as far as the opt-in/opt-out status being shown on a Medievia player's playerinfo? So what! If a player within the game chooses to treat another player differently because of that, that is THEIR option, what PLAYERS choose to do based on ANY flag of another is NOT under this site's jurisdiction. And as far as the Gods go? I'll put it quite simply: GODS HAVE RULES TOO. If they're told not to put any heed to it, they won't. Enough said.

Personally, I feel this is getting ridiculous. People are just slinging #### back at one another over one petty game change. gameover, I seriously believe you have absolutely NO LIFE, for bringing this into a global forum. If you have problems with a game, ANY GAME, it would be reasonable to take it up with those that you have issues with. It doesn't need to be trotted out like this.

As far as what is/is not said, and forging logs of a channel, whomever said that if it were a fake log, it would have included such heartbreaking events as a character being purged, etc..., you are blind. Yes, most fake logs are private logs, because those are a) harder to prove without bringing system-generated logs into the picture, and b) more believable to the controversy-inclined public. But, a few things need to be brought up that, sadly, have not been yet. The time stamped on that first post was Monday, 12-December, at 6:12 AM...this would have been within 10 minutes of a game restart. Not many people are in very quickly after a restart, especially at that time of day. I personally went to bed after that restart. A restart is a break in all progress, and a good stopping point for a few minutes to go get something to eat, run to the bathroom, etc...it does not, therefore, surprise me that there aren't many able to say whether or not that statement was real, or a fabrication. I don't feel that Medievia's staff should have to trot out system logs for you all to see to refute that comment, simply because it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO ANYTHING. It just started the whole controversy, which seems to be what everyone wanted here.

12-13-2005, 08:26 PM	#90
Aeternitas New Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 6	Just a few cents to toss in here, now that the crap has flown for a few hours again...as a sidenote, I am amazed by the petty behaviour from all sides. First, the modification made to the rules, seems to be serving to JUST FIT what Aardwolf chooses to do. Is it because they did it first? I seriously doubt that it can be that they have a better game, and because if it, I'd like to call on Synozeer to ask him what game(s) HE plays, and perhaps what levels of characters he has on them...not to cry Conspiracy Theory, or anything. Back to the system, it is, regardless of opt-in/opt-out, a canvass of the game. Without any game having a system of this nature, would the votes still break down the way they do? THAT QUESTION has yet to be asked. Second, as far as the opt-in/opt-out status being shown on a Medievia player's playerinfo? So what! If a player within the game chooses to treat another player differently because of that, that is THEIR option, what PLAYERS choose to do based on ANY flag of another is NOT under this site's jurisdiction. And as far as the Gods go? I'll put it quite simply: GODS HAVE RULES TOO. If they're told not to put any heed to it, they won't. Enough said. Personally, I feel this is getting ridiculous. People are just slinging #### back at one another over one petty game change. gameover, I seriously believe you have absolutely NO LIFE, for bringing this into a global forum. If you have problems with a game, ANY GAME, it would be reasonable to take it up with those that you have issues with. It doesn't need to be trotted out like this. As far as what is/is not said, and forging logs of a channel, whomever said that if it were a fake log, it would have included such heartbreaking events as a character being purged, etc..., you are blind. Yes, most fake logs are private logs, because those are a) harder to prove without bringing system-generated logs into the picture, and b) more believable to the controversy-inclined public. But, a few things need to be brought up that, sadly, have not been yet. The time stamped on that first post was Monday, 12-December, at 6:12 AM...this would have been within 10 minutes of a game restart. Not many people are in very quickly after a restart, especially at that time of day. I personally went to bed after that restart. A restart is a break in all progress, and a good stopping point for a few minutes to go get something to eat, run to the bathroom, etc...it does not, therefore, surprise me that there aren't many able to say whether or not that statement was real, or a fabrication. I don't feel that Medievia's staff should have to trot out system logs for you all to see to refute that comment, simply because it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO ANYTHING. It just started the whole controversy, which seems to be what everyone wanted here.